Now booking enterprise content platform builds for 2026. Contact us

CMS migration RFP template

An editable brief for choosing a CMS migration partner, with a workbook to compare proposals and three-year costs.

  • DOCX 26-section RFP with content inventory, vendor questions and evaluation criteria.
  • PDF The complete template for reading and sharing.
  • XLSX Score three vendors and compare costs, with editable weights and formulas.
Preview the template

Get the template

Free to edit and use under your own name.

Your email is used to deliver these files. Privacy policy

Template excerpts

Scope questions from sections 4 and 13 of the RFP.

Migration scope
DecisionBuyer providesVendor must explain
Content volumeItem counts by type, language and migrate / archive / drop decision.The expected automated and manual split, and the basis for it.
TransformationRich text, embedded components, media and relationships in scope.The transformation pipeline and how references and media are preserved.
VerificationContent owners and acceptance requirements.Who compares the migrated content, the sample size and pass threshold.
Cutover changesThe content freeze window and publishing constraints.How changes during the build reach the new system through a delta import.

Scroll to see all columns.

The full response schedule also asks vendors to price content inventory and mapping separately.

Example criteria from section 24. Confirm mandatory requirements and agree weights before scoring vendors from 0 to 5.

Vendor scoring
CriterionWeightEvidence to request
Content migration20%A transformation pipeline, an automated / manual split and an operational verification step.
Redirects and search10%URL inventory sources, redirect ownership, monitoring and a retention commitment.
Cutover and rollback10%A runbook, rehearsal, rollback trigger and named decision maker.
Commercials10%An itemised schedule, three-year run costs and a priced change process.

Scroll to see all columns.

Four of nine criteria shown; the full set totals 100%. A score of 4/5 at 20% earns 16 points. Totals appear once all scores are entered.

Use one currency, tax basis and start date for all bidders. Enter implementation once, then the three annual run costs.

Three-year cost
Cost lineIncludeClarify before scoring
ImplementationDiscovery, build, migration, QA, training and cutover.Fixed price or estimate; exclusions, assumptions and contingency.
Licences and hostingEach year’s platform, infrastructure and tooling costs.Editors, locales, traffic, storage, API calls and environments.
Operating costSupport and internal effort over each of the three years.Service scope, response targets and the internal team needed.
Transition and exitOld-platform overlap and a stated exit allowance.Anything already included elsewhere, and costs still unknown.

Scroll to see all columns.

The workbook totals undiscounted costs. A blank means unknown; enter 0 only for a confirmed zero. Remove duplicate costs before comparing totals.

Full contents: 26 sections and 4 appendices

The brief you fill in

  1. 01 Organisation, contacts, and how to respond
  2. 02 Why you are moving
  3. 03 What exists today
  4. 04 Content inventory
  5. 05 Content model and editorial workflow
  6. 06 Integration register
  7. 07 URLs, redirects, and search continuity
  8. 08 Non-functional requirements
  9. 09 Localisation, brands, and regions
  10. 10 Constraints, budget, and timeline
  11. 11 Explicitly out of scope

The schedule vendors answer

  1. 12 Scope and deliverables
  2. 13 Content migration approach
  3. 14 Integration approach
  4. 15 Redirect and search continuity plan
  5. 16 Editorial workflow, roles, permissions
  6. 17 Training and enablement
  7. 18 QA and acceptance
  8. 19 Cutover and rollback
  9. 20 Hypercare and ongoing support
  10. 21 Team, ways of working, references
  11. 22 Commercials
  12. 23 Contract terms: IP, data, and exit

Evaluating the responses

  1. 24 Weighted scoring matrix
  2. 25 Red flags
  3. 26 RFP process timeline

Appendices

  1. A Content inventory sheet
  2. B Integration register
  3. C Redirect map
  4. D Clarification log

Published by WAYF. Version 1.1, September 2026.